If you’re an avid vaper, you’re probably well-acquainted with different types of rebuildable atomizers. Two popular options are RTAs and RDTAs, but what’s the difference between the two? Well, to put it simply, the main difference lies in the position of the tank. While the RTA has a traditional bottom-mounted tank, the RDTA has a tank that sits on top of the deck, feeding the coils through gravity.
One of the advantages of RTAs is that they can hold more liquid compared to other atomizers. This means fewer refills and more vape time. However, because of their size, they can be a bit bulky and may not fit comfortably in all setups. RDTAs, on the other hand, tend to have a smaller tank and a sleeker overall design. Their position also makes them less prone to leaking, which is always a plus.
Ultimately, the decision between an RTA and RDTA will come down to personal preference and vaping style. If you’re someone who values convenience and wants a larger capacity tank, an RTA may be a better choice. But if you’re after a sleeker design and less mess, the RDTA might be the way to go. Either way, both options provide a great vaping experience for those who are willing to take the time to build coils and experiment with their vaping setup.
Understanding RTA (Rebuildable Tank Atomizer)
As vaping continues to gain popularity, more and more vapers are turning to rebuildable atomizers for a customized and high-performance vaping experience. RTAs, or rebuildable tank atomizers, have become a favorite among vaping enthusiasts due to their versatility and ability to create a unique vaping experience. But what exactly is an RTA and how is it different from other atomizer types?
- RTAs are a type of rebuildable atomizer that use a tank to hold e-juice instead of a drip system. This allows for longer vaping sessions without having to refill the atomizer frequently.
- Unlike pre-built coils or pods, RTAs require the user to build their own coils and wicking to customize their vaping experience.
- RTAs offer more control over the vaping experience, allowing the user to adjust the wicking and airflow to their liking for a more personalized hit.
While RTAs may seem intimidating to new vapers, they offer a satisfying and customizable vaping experience for those willing to put in the effort to learn how to build and use them.
The Anatomy of an RTA
Before diving into the differences between RTAs and other types of atomizers, it’s important to understand the basic components of an RTA. These include:
- Chimney: The chamber where the vapor is formed before being inhaled.
- Deck: The base that holds the coils and wick.
- Tank: The section that holds the e-juice, allowing for longer vaping sessions without frequent refilling.
- Wicking: The material that carries the e-juice to the coil. The wick is placed in the deck and extends to the tank, allowing the juice to flow into the chamber where vapor is formed.
- Coil: A wire that heats up to vaporize the e-juice. RTAs require the user to build their own coils, allowing for a customized vaping experience.
Once the user has constructed their coil and wick, they are placed in the deck and the chamber is filled with e-juice. The user then inhales through the drip tip, drawing the vapor into their mouth and lungs.
RDTA (Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizer) in detail
The RDTA (Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizer) is a unique type of atomizer that combines the features of a rebuildable dripping atomizer (RDA) and a rebuildable tank atomizer (RTA). It offers the user the advantages of both atomizers, providing an excellent vaping experience where you don’t have to keep dripping e-liquid onto the coil and wick while also having the convenience of a removable tank.
- Capable of delivering huge clouds and intense flavor – When compared to other types of atomizers, the RDTA produces the best flavor and vapor production, delivering an unmatched vaping experience. This is because the coils are in close proximity to the mouthpiece, allowing the vapor to travel a shorter distance, which enhances the user’s experience.
- Allows for customization and flexibility – RDTAs provide a high degree of customization and flexibility when it comes to building coils. This means you can experiment with different wire types, coils, and wicking materials to find the perfect vape. RDTAs can handle single-coil or dual-coil builds, and some models are even compatible with complex coil configurations.
- Eliminates the need to continuously drip e-liquid – As stated earlier, RDTAs combine the features of RDAs and RTAs. With an RDA, you must continuously drip e-liquid onto the coils and wick. But with an RDTA, you can store e-liquid inside the tank, which will feed the e-liquid to the wick and coil, avoiding the need to continuously drip.
There are a few different types of RDTAs on the market, including top-fill RDTAs, bottom-fill RDTAs, and side-fill RDTAs. Some models also come with additional features, such as adjustable airflow, adjustable e-liquid control, and velocity-style build decks. When choosing an RDTA, take into consideration your preferences and vaping style.
RDTAs can be an excellent choice for advanced vapers who are looking for a high level of customization and want the convenience of a removable tank. If you’re new to vaping, you might want to try out other types of atomizers before moving on to RDTAs. But if you’re ready to take your vaping game to the next level, the RDTA might be the perfect atomizer for you.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Better flavor and vapor production than other atomizers | Can be more expensive than other atomizers |
| Customizable and flexible | Require more building knowledge than other atomizers |
| Eliminates the need to continuously drip e-liquid | Not suitable for beginner vapers |
Overall, the RDTA is an excellent choice for vapers who are looking for a high level of customization, convenience, and excellent flavor and vapor production. It combines the best features of RDAs and RTAs and provides an unmatched vaping experience. Remember to always research and choose the best product that suits your preferences and vaping style!
The Pros and Cons of RTA vs. RDTA
If you’re a vaper, you’re likely familiar with the terms RTA and RDTA. These are two types of rebuildable atomizers that allow you to customize your vaping experience. But what’s the difference between the two? Here, we’ll take a closer look at the pros and cons of RTA vs. RDTA.
Pros and Cons of RTA vs. RDTA
- RTA Pros: RTAs are more compact than RDTAs, which makes them easier to carry around with you. They are also generally less expensive than RDTAs. Additionally, RTAs are generally easier to build on than RDTAs since the wicking process is simpler.
- RTA Cons: RTAs often have a smaller juice capacity than RDTAs, which means you’ll have to refill them more frequently. They can also be more difficult to wick without causing leaks.
- RDTA Pros: RDTAs have a larger juice capacity than RTAs, which means you’ll be able to vape for longer periods without needing to refill. They also offer excellent flavor and vapor production, which is something many vapers prioritize.
- RDTA Cons: RDTAs are typically more expensive than RTAs, which can make them less accessible to some vapers. They also tend to be larger and bulkier than RTAs, which can be a drawback for those who prioritize portability.
Which One Should You Choose?
Ultimately, the best option for you will depend on your personal preferences and habits. If you prioritize portability, affordability, and ease of use, an RTA might be the better choice for you. If, however, you prioritize flavor and vapor production and don’t mind spending a bit more money, an RDTA might be the way to go. It’s important to try out a few different types of atomizers to find the one that works best for your specific vaping needs.
Conclusion
When it comes to RTA vs. RDTA, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Both types of atomizers have their pros and cons, so it’s important to carefully consider your priorities and preferences before making a decision. Whether you choose an RTA or an RDTA, both options can allow you to customize your vaping experience and get the most out of your e-juice.
| RTAs | RDTAs |
|---|---|
| Less expensive | More expensive |
| Smaller juice capacity | Larger juice capacity |
| Easier to build on | More difficult to build on |
| Can be more difficult to wick | Excellent flavor and vapor production |
As you can see, there are several key differences between RTAs and RDTAs. By weighing the pros and cons of each, you can make an informed decision about which type of atomizer is right for you.
Coil placement in RTA vs. RDTA
One of the main differences between RTA and RDTA is the placement of the coil. In an RTA, the coil is placed in a build deck, which is similar to that of a traditional rebuildable dripping atomizer (RDA). The coil is then wrapped with cotton wicks to absorb the e-liquid, which is stored in the tank below the build deck. The airflow is typically located at the bottom of the build deck, which aids in the overall flavor production of the atomizer.
On the other hand, in an RDTA, the coil placement is slightly different. The coil is still placed in a build deck, but instead of a tank below the deck, there is a reservoir located directly beneath the coil. The wicks dangle down into the reservoir and absorb the e-liquid. The airflow is usually located at the top of the device, which creates a different airflow pattern compared to an RTA. This airflow design allows for more customization and control over the flavor and vapor production.
- RTA: Coil placed in build deck, with cotton wicks wrapped around it to absorb e-liquid. Airflow typically located at the bottom of the deck.
- RDTA: Coil placed in build deck, with cotton wicks dangling down into a reservoir beneath the deck to absorb e-liquid. Airflow typically located at the top of the device.
One advantage to having the coil placed above the e-liquid reservoir in the RDTA is that there is a shorter distance for the vapor to travel before it reaches the mouthpiece. This can lead to a more flavorful experience as the vapor is not diluted by passing through a longer pathway. Additionally, RDTAs tend to have a larger e-liquid capacity than RTAs, which means that they can be used for longer periods of time without needing to refill.
Another factor to consider is the overall ease of building with each type of atomizer. While RTAs tend to be easier to build on due to their simplicity, RDTAs require a bit more skill and finesse when it comes to coil placement. However, for those willing to put in the time and effort to master the art of RDTA building, the payoff can be a unique and satisfying vaping experience.
| RTA | RDTA |
|---|---|
| Coil placed in build deck | Coil placed in build deck |
| Cotton wicks wrapped around coil | Cotton wicks dangle down into a reservoir beneath deck |
| Airflow typically located at bottom of build deck | Airflow typically located at top of device |
| Shorter vapor pathway | Larger e-liquid capacity |
In conclusion, while there are similarities between RTAs and RDTAs, the placement of the coil and method of e-liquid delivery make them unique in their own ways. Choosing between the two will ultimately depend on personal preference, experience and skill level, and desired vaping experience.
Different Wicking Methods for RTA and RDTA
Wicking is the process of saturating the wick with e-juice, giving the coil the liquid needed to produce vapor. RTAs (Rebuildable Tank Atomizers) and RDTAs (Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizers) use different wicking methods, as their design and usage are slightly different.
- In an RTA, the wick is inserted into a small juice hole, placed on top of the tank, and then coated with e-juice. The juice then travels up the wick to the coil, where it is vaporized. RTAs require precise wicking to avoid leaks or dry hits.
- RDTAs, on the other hand, use a deck that sits on top of the tank. The wick is placed through the coil and then extended into the tank, where it can absorb e-juice from the reservoir below. This allows vapers to drip e-juice over the coil manually, providing a more customizable vaping experience.
Factors to Consider When Wicking an RTA
When wicking an RTA, there are several factors to keep in mind:
- The thickness of the wick material: Thicker wicks can handle more e-juice, but can be harder to insert into the juice ports
- The length of the wick: An appropriately sized wick will ensure proper saturation of the coil without obstructing the juice ports
- The placement of the wick: Properly placing the wick in the juice ports is key to avoiding dry hits and leaks
Factors to Consider When Wicking an RDTA
While wicking an RDTA is generally more forgiving than wicking an RTA, there are still factors to consider:
- The thickness and length of the wick: These should be appropriate for the size of the coil and the juice reservoir on the RDTA
- The placement of the wick: The wick should be extended enough into the juice reservoir to allow for proper e-juice absorption, but not so far that it obstructs the airflow
- The frequency of e-juice dripping: Depending on the size of the reservoir and your individual vaping habits, you may need to drip e-juice frequently to ensure proper saturation of the wick and coil
Wicking Materials for RTAs and RDTAs
Both RTAs and RDTAs usually use organic cotton or other cotton blends as wicking materials. Some RTA users find success with rayon or hemp wicks, but these require more precise cutting and insertion. RDTAs can also use mesh or stainless steel wicks, which can provide a longer lasting and more consistent vape.
| Wicking Material | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Organic Cotton | Natural material, easily obtained, easy to work with, good saturation | May require more frequent wick changes, prone to burning |
| Rayon | Good saturation, longer lasting than cotton, less likely to burn | Requires more precise cutting and insertion, may have a break-in period |
| Hemp | Natural material, long-lasting, handles high temperatures well | Requires more precise cutting and insertion, may have a break-in period |
| Stainless Steel Mesh | Long lasting, strong flavor | Requires a specific type of RDTA, some consider them difficult to work with |
Ultimately, the wicking method and material chosen will depend on the individual vaper’s preferences, experience, and equipment. Experimenting with different methods and materials can help vapers achieve optimal flavor and vapor production.
Comparing the flavor and vapor production of RTA and RDTA
When it comes to flavor and vapor production, both RTA (Rebuildable Tank Atomizer) and RDTA (Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizer) can be excellent choices for vapers. However, there are some differences that may make one option better suited to your vaping style than the other.
Let’s take a closer look at how RTAs and RDTAs compare in terms of flavor and vapor production.
- RTA flavor: Because RTAs have a tank to hold e-liquid, the wick stays wet, ensuring consistent flavor throughout your vaping experience. Additionally, RTAs often have more airflow options, allowing you to customize your draw and enhance the taste of your e-liquid.
- RDTA flavor: RDTAs have a dripper-like build deck, which means you can directly drip e-liquid onto the coils for a more intense flavor. However, the wick tends to dry out more quickly than in an RTA, resulting in slightly less consistent flavor.
- RTA vapor: RTAs produce vapor more slowly and steadily than RDTAs. This is because the wick is always saturated, allowing for continuous vaping without the need for constant dripping. The draws on an RTA are also often smoother and longer due to the multiple airflow options.
- RDTA vapor: RDTAs produce massive clouds of vapor due to their build deck design, which usually includes larger coils and more airflow options. However, since you have to manually drip e-liquid onto the wick, the vapor production will be interrupted every few puffs, making for a more inconsistent vapor experience.
In terms of overall flavor and vapor production, both RTAs and RDTAs have their strengths. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and vaping style. If you enjoy big clouds and don’t mind stopping to drip every few puffs, an RDTA may be the way to go. If consistent flavor and convenience are your priorities, then an RTA may be the better choice.
Overall, both RTAs and RDTAs offer excellent flavor and vapor production capabilities. It’s up to you to decide which is best for your individual vaping preferences.
Cost analysis: RTA vs. RDTA
When it comes to choosing between an RTA (Rebuildable Tank Atomizer) and an RDTA (Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizer), one of the key factors to consider is the cost. Let’s take a closer look at the cost comparison between these two options:
- RTA typically costs less upfront compared to RDTA. This is because the design of an RTA is simpler, and there are fewer components required to build it.
- On the other hand, RDTA may cost more upfront due to its more complex design and the additional components required to build it.
- With RTA, you have the option of using pre-made coils, which are often cheaper than building your own. This can save you money in the long run, especially if you’re just starting with rebuildables.
- With RDTA, you’ll need to factor in the cost of building your own coils. While this can be more cost-effective in the long run, the upfront cost of purchasing the required tools and materials can be high.
- Both RTA and RDTA require wicking materials such as organic cotton. The cost of these materials is typically the same for both options.
- Another factor to consider is the frequency of coil replacement. With RDTA, you’ll need to replace your coils more often due to the nature of dripping. This can add to the long-term cost of using an RDTA.
- Overall, the choice between RTA and RDTA ultimately depends on personal preferences and needs. While an RTA may be more cost-effective upfront, an RDTA can provide a more flavorful and customizable vaping experience, which may be worth the extra cost for some users.
In summary, RTA typically costs less upfront and can be more cost-effective in the long run if you’re using pre-made coils. However, RDTA has a more complex design and requires more components and tools, making it more expensive upfront. Additionally, you’ll need to factor in the cost of building your own coils with an RDTA. Ultimately, the choice between RTA and RDTA will depend on your personal preferences and vaping needs.
To make an informed decision, consider your vaping style, frequency of use, and budget. Take the time to research and compare different options before making a purchase.
| Cost Factor | RTA | RDTA |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront Cost | Less expensive | More expensive |
| Coil Cost | Pre-made coils are affordable | Higher cost due to coil building materials/tools |
| Wicking Material Cost | Same for both options | Same for both options |
| Coil Replacement Frequency | Less frequent | More frequent |
Keep in mind that the cost comparison between RTA and RDTA is just one factor to consider. Ultimately, you’ll want to choose the option that provides the best vaping experience for you, whether that’s an RTA or an RDTA.
What’s the difference between RTA and RDTA?
1) What is RTA?
RTA stands for Rebuildable Tank Atomizer. It is a type of atomizer that has a tank to hold the e-liquid, and users can build their coils on it.
2) What is RDTA?
RDTA stands for Rebuildable Dripping Tank Atomizer. It also has a tank to hold e-liquid, but it also has a dripping deck where users can drip their e-liquid directly onto the coils.
3) What is the difference between RTA and RDTA?
The main difference between them is the way the e-liquid is delivered. RTA has a tank to hold e-liquid, and users don’t have to drip e-liquid onto the coils, while RDTA has a dripping deck for users to drip e-liquid onto the coils.
4) Which one is easier to use, RTA or RDTA?
It depends on the user’s preference. RTA is a bit easier to use because users don’t have to drip e-liquid onto the coils frequently, while RDTA requires users to drip e-liquid onto the coils more frequently.
5) Which one is better, RTA or RDTA?
Again, it depends on the user’s preference. RTA is better for users who prefer convenience and longer vaping time. RDTA is better for users who prefer better flavor and vapor production.
Closing Thoughts
Thanks for reading about the difference between RTA and RDTA. Both devices have their pros and cons, but ultimately, it’s up to the user to decide which one suits their vaping style. We hope you visit us again for more informative articles about vaping. Happy vaping!